THE NATURE OF MATTER
PHYSICS
MYSTERIES
EXPLAINED
COSMIC MYSTERIES Section 1 The
Missing Mass of Galactic Rotation
CHAPTER
1
Section 2 The Source of the Cosmic Microwave
Background Radiation
THE MISSING MASS OF GALACTIC ROTATION
Section 1
One of the primary reasons to initially speculate the existence of a background of
matter was to attempt to account for the dark matter or missing
mass of galactic rotation. The missing mass of galactic rotation is the
mass not yet observed but which is required to explain galactic rotation with the
force of gravity alone.
Whirlpool Galaxy M51
The missing mass of galactic rotation, or dark matter, must exist if the
only force considered to drive galactic rotation is gravity because there is 90%
too little mass observed in a typical galaxy to account for the rotational velocity
of the stars and dust clouds in rotation around the galactic center.
One of the author's driving hopes was that a background of matter could possibly
explain the dark matter or missing mass of galactic rotation. It was hoped that since
the flow of the background is magnetic flux, that some combination of plasma physics
(magnetic flux) and general relativity (contracting spacetime around galaxies) -
both known physics - could possibly explain the missing mass of galactic rotation.
Plasma physics was obviously involved in galactic dynamics judging solely by the
great jets some galaxies produce, which are obviously focused by magnetic flux. General
relativity obviously must be observed by any theory and it was hoped that general
relativity could help explain the missing mass of galactic rotation by spacetime
actually contracting around galaxies and concentrating intergalactic matter in the
galaxies.
Then, the author discovered the book Quasars,
Red Shifts, and Controveries by Halton Arp. Observation is
everthing and a theory is only as good as it fits the observations.
Quasars, Red Shifts, and Controveries by Halton Arp Interstellar Media 1987.
Seeing Red, by Halton Arp Apeiron. 1998
Halton Arp's interpretation of the observations is stunning in that it is the
complete reverse of all other conceptualizations of galactic dynamics. All other
conceptualizations have the galactic matter condensing under the influence of gravity.
Arp observes active galaxies to eject quasars which ultimately develop into full
galaxies.
Arp strongly argues that spiral arms of spiral galaxies are created by are trails
of bipolar ejecta which are ejected from the galactic nucleus.
The matter creation ejection mechanism purported by Arp negates
the need to explain the missing mass of galactic rotation.
First, gravity alone ...
Supposing gravity as the only force driving galactic rotation means supposing there
must be 90% more mass than has been observed.
There are two problems with dark matter that contradict the known laws of physics.
One problem is that the dark matter of galactic rotation must be transparent in the
frequencies observed. The other problem is that the dark matter must not radiate
thermal radiation like every other known body of matter in the universe.
Therefore, there are 3 glaring signals that something is wrong with thinking that
gravity is the sole driving force in galaxy dynamics:
Once the Unit Matter Substructure Theory
had been deduced, and the distinction between matter and energy as components of
Standard Model particles had been made, the direct consequence was a possible massless
cold particle, a particle of pure matter.
Since the Unit Matter Substructure Theory
explained a dozen mysteries of particle physics, it seemed it had to be correct.
If the Unit Matter Substructure Theory
was correct, then there was the massless particle of pure matter to consider.
One had to wonder if a ubiquitous massless particle of pure matter could be a candidate
for the dark matter required to explain galactic rotation.
[For a Space
Telescope Science Institute definition of
dark
matter.]
Clearly, jets emanting from some galaxes are evidence of trmendous magnetic flux
in the nucluei of those galaxies.
Plasma cosmology seemed better able to explain galactic jets
of antimatter than pure gravitational interactions, expecially when 90% of the
mass required to explain galactic rotation is missing. Plamsa cosmology is ruled
out in standard accepted physics because of the large electrostatic forces that must
exist.
The initial concept in thinking of the background of matter might explain galactic
rotation was that the background could be contracting around galactic nuclei and
ejecting out the poles somewhat like the atomosphere contracting around low pressure
cells and ejecting air out the center pole. This is a deeper concept that simple
electrostatic type forces causing galactic rotation because the background is contracting,
space itself is contracting, and the motion of the background is magnetic flux.
Therefore, the question was, is there some sythesis of general relativity (with space
contracting) and plasma cosmology (motion of background is magnetic flux) that could
explain galactic rotation?
It looked very possible. The background defines space, energy defines time, and energy
flowing through the background is the spacetime of General Relativity. The author
strongly suspected that plasma physics and general relativity merged in some way
when the flow of the background defined magnetic flux and when the background defined
space.
Then, the author discovered:
Quasars, Red Shifts, and Controveries by Halton Arp Interstellar Media 1987.
Then
Seeing Red by Halton Arp Apeiron. 1998
The author thinks any reasonable person who has read Halton
Arp's books should be seriously considering his interpretation of the observations.
Unfortunately for the author, the mechanism purported by Arp negated the need to
explain the missing mass of galactic rotation and removed one huge reason for postulating
the background of matter in the beginning of its investigation.
Observation is everything and a theory is only good as long as it is consistent all
observations.
Halton Arp's interpretation of his observations runs counter to the presently accepted
explanations of how galaxies rotate or how spiral arms in spiral galaxies are created.
Halton Arp has observational evidence that galactic nuclei eject material that evolves
into quasars. Arp also claims observations show that the spiral arms of the great
spirral galaxies are caused by the ejections out of the galaxies. The observational
evidence he presents is very strong.
Unfortunately, the spiral arms of galaxies being caused by matrial ejected from the
galaxy negates the need to explain the missing mass of galactic rotation because
the galaxy is no longer considered to formed by gravity in Halton Arp's physics.
Observations are everything and theory is fleeting.
The need to explain the missing mass of galactic rotation was a driving force in
conceptualizing the background of matter. The lack of a need to explain the missing
mass of galactic rotation negates the grand reason to have thought a background of
matter might exist, because its existence could possibly help explain galactic dynamics
as plasma physics with the background motion being magnetic flux and with the background
expanding and contracting according to general relativity.
POTENTIAL EVIDENCE OF THE BACKGROUND OF MATTER:
MANIFESTED BY PLASMA PHYSICS
Gas Clouds - Twisters, Horsehead Nebulae, Eagle Nebulae Pillars
Supersonic dust clouds around that galaxies - NGC 4261
Positron Jet from the Milky Way pole NW press release
Polar Jets from Galaxies - SEDS M87 - quasars
The dual lobe structure of supernovas - Hubble Space Telescope Nebulae
The dual lobe structure of supernovas and their intricate structures is strong evidence of plasma physics.
Halton Arps's claim that galaxies eject mass creating
energy can be pictured easily just looking at the following sequence of pictures
- the best pictures by the Hubble Space Telescope.
Relativistic beams eminating from galactic poles may indicate
strong magnetic flux focusing the beam. Gas and dust disks around galactic nuclei
were not predicted by gravitational physics.
The M87 and its relativistic beam of elementary particles: Gas disks around galactic nuclei: The following pictures are examples of what Halton Arp may
be talking about.
Ejecta fom the medial axis of active galactic nuclei:
a polar ring galaxy
two starburst ring galaxies
and galactic arcs
Comments welcome: jrees@starlight-pub.com
Last update: December 7, 2000
Copyright © 2000
Starlight Publishing Company
Hermosa Beach, CA